Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:KeybladeSephi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

User:KeybladeSephi
The result of the debate was Keep nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 04:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC).

Inappropriate use of User Page per WP:USERPAGE, and it is an inappropriate use of User Page space. –- kungming·  2 (Talk) 06:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep for Now The reason why this seemingly was made was to advertise a website. It is not okay to make a userpage only for the purpose of advertising a website, though it is okay to have a link to a website in your userspace. This page could be changed so it has some valid information on it. The deletion policy states "If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion." Also, it may upset the user if we delete it. If the page still is not fixed soon after we leave him a message, then we can delete it then.--SJP 20:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! –- kungming·  2 (Talk) 23:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - it's just one link, which is fine. Quality (or lack of) is not a reason for deletion in this case. - Koweja 00:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:EM. The user page consists of a single link labeled with the word "Site". That's all, just "Site". That's about as low key as one can get in terms of identifying an external link. Also, the editor has contributed to editing the mainspace of the encyclopedia. I see no violation of WP:USER here. --Metropolitan90 02:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per Metropolitan90. No reason for deletion here - plenty of users link to their sites. Auroranorth (sign) 10:32, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as it stands; linking to homepages is okay for active users. I don't even get why it really was deleted in the first place; yep, the user seemed to focus too much on the user page, but heck, it was not like they were running a messageblogboardmmorpg there... --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 11:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.