Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Khayyam 77/Afedism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) 🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  00:07, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Khayyam 77/Afedism

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

As this is a personal opinion of this user per the Afedism paragraph, this fails WP:UP. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:42, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete for two reasons. This is a personal opinion essay that is not a plausible draft.  I would consider rejecting it if it were submitted as a draft, but it isn't being submitted.  Second, it is the work of an editor who hasn't been here for two years.  There should be a time limit on how long junk can be kept in the user space of non-users.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:06, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * There should not be time limits. One of the driving philosophies of Wikipedia is that there are no time limits. Your reference to “non-users” is confusing.  Who are the non-users?  Are you beginning a campaign to define inactive users as non-users? SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. A productive user’s userpage notes, sufficiently related to Wikipedia, and not the least bit offensive as presented. Well within standard leeway, with only 5% of the user’s edits being in userspace, and most in mainspace. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep This content is not extensive in the context of WP:UP. Even ignoring that, minor things such as this, when done by a user who is here to build an encyclopedia, do not warrant the policing of userspace. —  csc -1 17:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - userspace drafts that don't qualify for CSD should just be left alone. (it does strike me as a draft rather than an unrelated essay, but I can see how it might seem otherwise). &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 23:10, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, as it is in userspaceJackattack1597 (talk) 18:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.