Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kinngh

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  No consensus - it appears to be too soon to determine if this is an attempt to host an article indefinitely or not. Wily D 07:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

User:Kinngh


Kinngh is a single purpose account, which, since it was created in March 2011, has done nothing but try to get an article about a non-notable person called Harshdeep Hura, very probably himself. The articles Harshdeep Hura and Harshdeep hura were both deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7 (article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject). A submission at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harshdeep Singh Hura was declined for lack of evidence of notability. The creation of a user page is clearly an attempt to get round the repeated failures to get the article he wants. WP:FAKEARTICLE is perfectly clear about this: userspace is not to be used as a way of keeping content which has been rejected for use as an article. (Incidentally, comparison of early and recent versions of the user's attempt to get his page accepted also encourage doubt as to the veracity of its content.) JamesBWatson (talk) 13:22, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:00, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Having looked at many cases, I have been convinced that there need be no latitute for user acounts that were SPA promoters. If not deleted, Blank.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Clear violation of WP:FAKEARTICLE. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 17:30, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Why delete a user page? In a couple of years no one will remember - and the whole wheel will be re-invented. Just blank the page if you see fit. Ottawahitech (talk) 16:14, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I could see this either way, most people know a user page when they see it and will not honestly believe this is an article (I have also now clearly tagged it as a userpage at the top and the bottom) but I also think it is important to send a message that spamming your non-notable music project is not tolerated here. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:27, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - The page was created 1 November 2012‎ and it now is 5 November 2012. Per WP:FAKEARTICLE, userspace is to be used as a way of short-term hosting of content under development, even if it has been rejected for use as an article. We have other techniques of addressing behavior than crushing content creation efforts. Kinngh does not have that many edits,. Userify to a subpage if needed, but it is too soon to delete the page at MfD. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:14, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.