Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Klillrud/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Klillrud/sandbox

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

The following are draft BLPs in various states of preparation or un-preparation of Karl Lillrud, Previous draft BLPs were already deleted in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Karl Lillrud



There is also a sockpuppet investigation of these draft BLPs. These may be multiple paid editors working for one client, which is meatpuppetry (and which is poorly defined), or these may be sockpuppetry. However, sockpuppetry is not relevant to the question of misuse of draft space, in order to create an article about a non-notable person by stealth. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * One of these, Razasardar, was submitted and rejected. The rest were unsubmitted, and are in various degrees of incompletion.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. User:Klillrud/sandbox may be Karl Lillrud's autobiography, but a userspace autobiography is acceptable.  It is sourced.  Forms of WP:Sockpuppetry are not a deletion reason unless voiced by someone qualified at WP:SPI, what you are doing is background unqualified clerking of SPI.  Your nomination is a lot of WP:ABF without citing evidence.  If the other pages have better cases for deletion, please list them separately with the better reasons explained.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:22, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete all. No indication that any of these is an autobiography, and Lillrud has been hiring people since (at least) 2019 to create an article about him; this post from today talks about a "deadline" to get an article about Lillrud published. Even if one of these accounts should be Lillrud himself, WP:UPNO would apply since all the seven accounts are SPAs, only concerned with creating drafts about Lillrud. This is an individual who is not notable so none of these drafts could ever become an article, and given that Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Karl Lillrud ended with several drafts being speedy deleted, there is no reason to let these languish in userspace. --bonadea contributions talk 17:57, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all as blatant promotional paid editing per the deletion log for Draft:Karl Lillrud, the speedy deletions at the other MfD, the lack of any other contributions of these accounts, the open admission of paid editing as pointed out by bonadea, and the fact that two of these have been rejected. —  csc -1 18:16, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.