Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kmweber/Some AfDs to fight (3rd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep - plausibly useful archive, possibly still in use by editor, "staleness" is not a particularly compelling reason for deletion. Wily D 17:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

User:Kmweber/Some AfDs to fight


4-year-old list of now long-since-closed AFDs which Kmweber intended to "fight". In all of them, he !voted his usual "speedy keep, it clearly exists, nothing else matters". A check shows that most of them have been deleted or fixed up, so at this point there's nothing to "fight". Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:49, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Other than having "to fight" in its title perhaps, I don't see what policy this page violates. Tijfo098 (talk) 20:38, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Then you're not familiar with Kmweber and his vicious insistence that "notability" is bollocks. This is just a leftover piece of his axe-grinding. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:45, 2 September 2012 (UTC)


 * That page really bothers you it seems. Keep, as per previous discussions. checking the first five AfDs to fight, I see two where the result was delete, yet the articles exist, fully sourced, not a single tag (a rare sight, pages without hidden categories). Maybe the list inspires people.. Ssscienccce (talk) 21:55, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - obsolete list of no real value to Wikipedia. If Kmweber can point to some value it has as a reason to keep it, I'm all ears, but it doesn't seem of much use to me. Robofish (talk) 22:35, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Weber's retired it seems, as he only did about 8 or 9 edits since 2010. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:45, 2 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep – Is linked from a few pages, including a talk page archive for the guideline about canvassing. The page isn't doing much good now, but it's not doing any harm either. Graham 87 11:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * This serves as useful historical evidence of Kurt's behaviour: it is hardly influential on current editors. If he were still using it then my attitude might be different, but that's not the case. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 14:26, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete (unless editor want to keep it) - seems stale. If the editor himself wants to keep it though, I'd change my !vote to 'keep' as it is reasonable use of one's userspace. 199.203.51.242 (talk) 10:36, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Looks like a work list that Kmweber uses to participate in Wikipedia. WP:UPYES permits "Notes related to your Wikipedia work and activities". If his participation within Wikipedia is disruptive, we can address the behavior. I don't see anything in this page that is disruptive behavior or that falls under WP:UPNOT. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:57, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a user work/notes page.  It is not a hate page and does not otherwise violate any guideline or policy, AFAIK.  There should be no great interest on anyone's part in attacking this user's work/note pages. -- do  ncr  am  15:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Wikipedia-related business in user space. No policy-based grounds for deletion. Carrite (talk) 17:53, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.