Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Krageon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was No consensus - Default Keep. — xaosflux  Talk  03:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Krageon
Not an active editor's page: Has 28 edits total (until today, the last in October), until today, all but 1 of them to add the 87 userboxes on this page. The remaining edit before today? Adding to someone else's user page. User:Krageon's most recent edits: six new edits today; removing the PROD tag, two minor edits to Lund, and to User:ChaosR again: a someone else with his own confusion regarding WP not being a free webhost/MySpace (he has 82 total edits in 3-1/2 months, 62 edits to his user page to add 83 userboxes, with only 6 article edits: I'm sensing "walled garden" here). --Calton | Talk 21:53, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'm pretty against deleting a user for not enough edits. I think we should just encourage these users to edit. I mean for the 5 months after I got an account I had one edit, then 2 months ago I had 24 (not including the 1) and this month I have 8 hundred something. -- DanielFolsom T|C|U 00:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, he had plenty of edits -- only they were exclusively to this page and adding its 87 userboxes. And the editor isn't being deleted, just his MySpace Lite user page, WP not being a free webhost/MySpace service for people who aren't actually contributing. --Calton | Talk 00:48, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * A lot of editors have a bunch of userboxes - and just because one editor has more edits and one has less doesn't mean the latter has a myspace lite page-- DanielFolsom T|C|U 02:02, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * What part of aren't actually contributing did you miss? What part of WP not being a free webhost did you miss? --Calton | Talk 04:16, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -- Mikedk9109  (hit me up) SIGN  18:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Calton. I should clean up my userpage too, but i can't be arsed to do so. ~Crazytales (IP locations!) 13:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. No real reason for this nomination was provided rather than the fact that the user is a newbie. Putting on plenty of userboxes on your page is allowed and has absolutely nothing to do with WP:NOT. Lets avoid judging pages by their creators.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   22:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.