Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:KreanMek

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  deleted by creator and sole author. Neither of the two comments below is valid, since the page was blank: there were no active links and no-one was forcing a user to retain a link or insisting on keeping a template in place. DrKiernan (talk) 06:42, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

User:KreanMek


Procedural nomination. The user whose userpage this is, would like it deleted, apparently for privacy reasons. A number of other users disagree on the grounds that the linkage to the user's prior account contained in the history of the page, should be retained in the history of the page. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a ridiculous thing for us to have a week-long discussion of. An editor is allowed to drop his old account name and start a new account as long as he isn't doing so to evade scrutiny or sanctions. However, no one seems to have alleged that (the old account has one 24-hour block for 3RR, about a year ago, and a few subsequent warnings, but it wasn't under any ArbCom or community sanctions or the like). I don't see any allegation that the change to a new account was made for a bad-faith reason, and the editor suggests the existence of a privacy rationale (whose nature I'd prefer not to speculate on). Given that fact, and in the absence of some problem I'm not immediately seeing, insisting on keeping the templates linking these two accounts in place strikes me as unnecessary. Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:13, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * NYB, just revdel the page history and tell these people to go pound sand. There is nothing in this project that forces a user to retain a link on his own user page to an abandoned account.  Nothing at all.  There's even edit-waring on the old account user page to force a link in to the new accoutn, this is absurd. Tarc (talk) 01:45, 21 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - It takes a lot of chutzpah to be this d-baggish 5 days before XMas. If the person is not under sanctions or topic bans under the previous name, then they have every right to abandon that account and the linkage to it. Tarc (talk) 01:45, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * that's not enough for me DrKiernan, please keep my privacy because that previous account is my real name even it's DrKiernan claim is pseudonymous, because my former account i use by equality to my real name (i mean if you search my old account name you will also find my real name from google, encyclopedia or a lot). please my former account's first contribute is in 27 november 2552bd (2009 ad) in Thai wikipedia, and it's hard for me for abandon my former account, it's four years got it DrKiernan four years but i just did.


 * you must unblock, unlink and delete in my userpage and my talkpage to keep my privacy, actually you can block my former account from another reason such as privacy or trolls or else from my honesty, but you fucking link to present account, this is attack! got it, FUCKYOU!


 * thank you from this "just revdel the page history and tell these people to go pound sand. There is nothing in this project that forces a user to retain a link on his own user page to an abandoned account.  Nothing at all.  There's even edit-waring on the old account user page to force a link in to the new accoutn, this is absurd." Tarc because you understand me.--KreanMek (talk) 04:08, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * if you unclear DrKiernan you can see my userpage in thai wikipedia th:ผู้ใช้:KreanMek and if you know bangkok thai language dialect. you can know me, i have already declare i am old user from WHO? person and i just want to keep my privacy, mother fucker? --KreanMek (talk) 04:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you look into the history of his Thai page, you will see that he copied some tables from another user and falsely claimed he personally knew many other prominent Thai editors. This entire table was then subsequently removed by another user with the comment that "I don't know you at all".

His edits has annoyed a lot of users both on the English and Thai wikipedia. Even his new name "Krean" which means something like "troll" in Thai. https://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%99 In additional, he claims that his level of English is en-5 "professional" but we can obviously see that this is not the case. His sub level English has caused a lot of headache on many English articles simply because his edits is just unintelligible.SeeingMole (talk) 16:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)