Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lakinekaki/Bios theory citations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Daniel (talk) 04:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Lakinekaki/Bios theory citations
This is also content that is kept in violation of the deletion of the Bios theory article. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lakinekaki/Bios theory. ScienceApologist (talk) 23:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Weakish keep. Meh, it's just a list of references.  Even if User:Lakinekaki/Bios theory is deleted, I don't see how this does any harm.  Might even be useful for anyone thinking of trying to write a legitimate article about the subject.  —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 23:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. A list of references is clearly appropriate stuff to collect in userspace.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. This should be grouped in with the below discussion. --UsaSatsui (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Nothing wrong with a list of citations. -- Ned Scott 08:44, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.