Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Laniwingate

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete After Midnight 0001 02:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

User:Laniwingate


Autobio rather than a user page. &mdash; RHaworth 10:29, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Userfy: Appears to be an attempt at an article, better to userfy than delete.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 19:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete It already is userfied. Textbook WP:STALEDRAFT. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 14:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Looks pretty stale to me.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 23:24, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - WP:STALEDRAFT doesn't say anything about old drafts. It's a misnomer and is under discussion at WT:UP.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 13:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Klein  zach  22:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. More important than any "staleness" (which actually is no longer the case since the user edited it after the MFD started) is that this is an autobiography of the user that is formatted similarly to an encyclopedia article. That's typically not accepted no matter how current the user keeps it. So although it goes to the same guideline, more apt shortcut here is WP:FAKEARTICLE. --RL0919 (talk) 05:25, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.