Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lapinmies/List of admins that have violated the rules


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was No consensus, with a note that if this ever becomes an attack page it will be immediatley speedy-able. — xaosflux  Talk  16:22, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Lapinmies/List of admins that have violated the rules
Attempts at beginning an attack page. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: that may have been the intention, but its currently mostly a list of self-added Admins. KillerChihuahua?!? 22:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This is definitely a joke page, and every admin here has added themselves. It's more like Category:Rouge admins than an attack page. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 23:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, In userspace, and self-added. If this becomes anything other than a self-adding list, then it can be speedied as an attack page. —  xaosflux  Talk  00:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * It's only a self-added list because that's what current admins have been doing with it, but it's not intended as such, it's intended as a page for people who dislike admins to complain about them. And attack pages are not acceptable in user space or anywhere else.  User:Zoe|(talk) 01:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, in the event it becomes something other than a harmless joke, it can be speedied on the spot. It just so happens there are several admins watchlisting it, who would see if it changed. In the meantime, it's a harmless joke page. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Gosh - how do you know who it watching it? -- ALoan (Talk) 10:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, the fact that it's been reverted/edited by every single admin on the list, and the fact that I know I've got it watchlisted. - A Man In Bl♟ck  (conspire | past ops) 08:33, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - it was intended as an attack page; the self-added admins were simply subverting its intention (at least, I was). -- ALoan (Talk) 10:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete if the user only used it for themselves then I wouldn't mind much, but that page encourages other users to list admin mistakes.-- Andeh 08:15, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Changed to Keep as it looks like more of a fun page than a serious attack against certain admins. Edits aren't quoted either so unless it does become a serious attack page I can't see any major harm in it.-- Andeh 12:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If it's serious, it's an attack page. If it's become a joke, it's not very funny. --Sam Blanning(talk) 11:40, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete because I'm not on it and I'm one of the worst admins in history (or so some people would have you believe). David | Talk 11:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probably borders on a speedy as an attack page. --Arnzy  (whats up?)  15:46, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Currently it's not an attack page, it's a list of self-added admins. It might turn into an attack page later, but hey, every editable page can turn into an attack page. He says "I will start collecting evidence", not "I will vandalize their pages and file a libel against them". We have lots of pages where we check each other's actions, what's wrong with this one? As soon as it becomes an attack page, we can speedy it, so imo there's no reason to delete it now. --Zoz (t) 17:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Sam Blanning. Sorry, not funny. -- nae'blis (talk) 21:44, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Zoz. QuizQuick 02:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is in user page and it is wikipedia humor now. `'mikka (t) 16:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Harmless fun. If the admins were added by the user, well, that would be something else entirely. --Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 16:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)


 * How would that be any different? QuizQuick QuizQuick 02:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Then it could be considered an attack page, rather than self-denigrating humor. --Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 17:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep at least until Tony Sideways gives his opinion. --M @ r ē ino 19:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Millennium hand and shrimp. -- ALoan (Talk) 20:59, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.