Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Larryzhao123/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  00:16, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

User:Larryzhao123/sandbox

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Sandbox of a LTA-blocked account. I wouldn't normally bother, but the sandbox's talk page is just a bunch of tags that make it explode and populate Category:Pages where post-expand include size is exceeded. It's probably speedi-able, but I figured I'd bring here just in case. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Why not replace with Userpage blanked? SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:46, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * LTA block. They won't be back. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:53, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Deletion of pages subpages because the user won’t be back is something that I disagree with.
 * If something about the LTA block makes a reason to delete (and blanking is not sufficient), then have a checkuser or an SPI clerk make the request, do not bring LTA clerking to MfD, MfD is not equipped to clerk LTA. SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:47, 8 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete as long as we are here, but bringing this here was ragpicking. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete per nom and Robert McClenon. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 14:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.