Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:LatinoMuslim/Wikipedia Boycott Campaign

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep - Arms & Hearts correctly notes that NOTWEBHOST explicitly applies only to non-Wikipedia materials, and furthermore makes it explicit humourous pages are allowed, making the deletion rationales mostly invalid (I'm not sure there's much grounds to evaluate whether being an unfunny joke versus a funny joke is a grounds for deletion, but without a consensus both that being an unfunny jokes is grounds for deletion (which might be here?, but the per TPH rationale is hard to evaluate when significant parts of TPH's rationale are wrong), and that it is unfunny (and I'd want to see better than two assertions of that against the writer's implied assertion otherwise to conclude as much), I can't see deleting on that grounds (since without a relevant policy or guidelines it'd essentially be taking an IAR approach). Wily D  06:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

User:LatinoMuslim/Wikipedia Boycott Campaign


using Wikipedia as a webhost or/and unfunny joke Bulwersator (talk) 18:13, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete As a joke, it falls flat; as a serious project, it's self-contradictory; as anything at all, it's a blatant misuse of userspace. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Any attempt to delete content that specifically targets Wikipedia itself with criticism should itself be considered highly critically. I do not find any imperative that demands the deletion of this page. __meco (talk) 11:45, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:NOTWEBHOST is about material unrelated to the encyclopedia, which this clearly isn't. Being an unfunny joke has never been grounds for deletion. – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 23:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep What is this, 7 years old? Really no reason to delete it. Mark as and move on. LegoKontribsTalkM 18:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per TPH. This is nonsense. --BDD (talk) 00:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per TPH as a blatant misuse of userspace. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 04:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - There was a previous MFD at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JuanMuslim/Wikipedia Boycott Campaign 7 years ago which resulted in no conensus. LegoKontribsTalkM 04:59, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.