Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:LavaBaron/United States presidential election, 2024

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Snow Keep - CRYSTAL doesn't even apply to sandboxes ... Anyway the editor is clearly working on it but just because they're not editing it everyday doesn't mean it's abandoned, If anything this looks like a POINTY MFD but either way there's no consensus to Delete. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:01, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

User:LavaBaron/United States presidential election, 2024


Fails WP:CRYSTALBALL MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a sandbox article. I'll be working on it, off and on, over the next eight years. Deleting an in-progress work in a sandbox, except in the case of potentially defamatory BLPs, is unprecedented. Recommend a 30-day block of MrLinkinPark333 for tendentious editing and nuisance abuse of process. LavaBaron (talk) 21:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep There is a lot of useful information here for an article that will eventually be created. This is a sandbox article that doesn't violate any policy. Earthscent (talk) 22:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment If you believe this userspace draft is indeed useful, then I am okay with it being kept. However, this discussion is to decide what is the best decision. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - sandboxes generally get a lo of leniency, just that it's speculation is not a reason to delete. Trout nominator, but a block seems extreme. --GRuban (talk) 00:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * keep lavabaron requested undeletion and userfying this to merge content with the us census 2020. I believe that had nog taken place yet. L.tak (talk) 06:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep, reasonable leeway in userspace. It is not mere crystal ball gazing.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. A draft is, by definition, a work-in-progress. There is nothing wrong with keeping this behind the scenes and incubating it over the next few years. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 18:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep There is no basis for deleting a user's sandbox work if it does not violate any of Wikipedia's policies per WP:BADSAND. --Iamozy (talk) 20:33, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a work-in-progess of an article that will eventually and inevitably be posted in the mainspace. There is little to no downside in userfying the content until then, and potentially a substantial upside in doing so.--JayJasper (talk) 22:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.