Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ldarling07

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep. JohnCD (talk) 20:55, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Ldarling07
This user's only three edits, made in June 2007, are test edits; however, WP:CSD specifically excludes test pages in userspace from being speedily deletable. There seems to be no reason to keep these tests around, though—they don't contribute to the encyclopedia. —Bkell (talk) 22:20, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Question: Is there any reason to delete this, though? It doesn't appear to violate any guidelines, and I was under the impression that we generally left things around in userspace unless they violated a specific guideline. Buddy431 (talk) 02:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)


 *  Delete  This test page violates WP:NOTWEBHOST in that the page is hosting a picture of the eye of, a non-contributor to Wikipedia. Cunard (talk) 20:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Or... it's a legitimate use of a user page (telling a little bit about yourself and including a picture). No, I doubt this editor is likely to come back, but this page isn't really doing any harm (or even breaking any of our policies).  I just see this as an abandoned account.  Unless someone comes and shows a precedent for deleting abandoned accounts, I'm going to say Keep. Buddy431 (talk) 20:35, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * That User:Ldarling07 is being used to host the personal picture of someone's eye—the eye of someone who has not contributed to Wikipedia—indicates that the policy WP:NOTWEBHOST is being violated. The deletion of this page does not equate to deletion of this abandoned account. Accounts cannot be deleted. Cunard (talk) 20:43, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The picture of the eye has been deleted at Files for deletion/2010 September 12. Deletion of this page per WP:NOTWEBHOST should be noncontroversial as well. Cunard (talk) 07:34, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  bibliomaniac 1  5  08:12, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep This userpage, while minimal, violates no policy, at least not now that the picture has apparently been deleted. Gigs (talk) 14:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Because the page is no longer hosting the image, it can remain. Keep. Cunard (talk) 06:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.