Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Legolover26/Japan–Russia border

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: redirect to Japan–Russia border. IAR closure by !voter given the unanimity. (non-admin closure) VQuakr (talk) 18:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

User:Legolover26/Japan–Russia border


Abandoned WP:UP Legacypac (talk) 17:08, 26 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Looks too much like an article. &thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 01:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Now, I guess I know what you mean but this does not look like an article because it starts "This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress". Arguments for deletion are more persuasive if they make relevant remarks. Thincat (talk) 08:11, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Regardless of a banner at the top, we don't host abandoned pages that are outdated copies of mainspace pages. Legacypac (talk) 15:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * where was this copied from? The user subpage was created in 2013; Japan–Russia border was created in 2015. At a glance, it seems like the user draft has some usable content since the article-space version is far from FA status. VQuakr (talk) 04:05, 31 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Maybe I got it backward or maybe the draft was copied over to mainspace. merge and redirect is perfectly fine. Legacypac (talk) 04:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)


 * As near as I can tell, they are completely independent of one another. Redirect without deleting history; there's already a note at Talk:Japan–Russia border about the draft's existence. VQuakr (talk) 04:27, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and exicute the redirect and close this than. Legacypac (talk) 05:08, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I !voted, and someone else !voted delete. can you expand on your rationale? VQuakr (talk) 06:31, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I had meant that the page was WP:FAKEARTICLE. But I am okay with redirecting.&thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 17:03, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.