Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Leland Gray

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete - everyone seems happy with the idea. Wily D 08:03, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

User:Leland Gray


This is a completely inappropriate use of a user page (self promotion at its finest) and a clear breach of WP:UP. ukexpat (talk) 16:57, 14 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:UPNO, WP:SPAM and WP:FAKEARTICLE - pretty much a textbook case of "substantial content [...] that is unrelated to Wikipedia". This could never be a Wikipedia article, and it's purely promotional. I guess blatant mis-use of "whom" isn't really a deletion criterion, though it does make me want to !vote BURNINATE rather than just Delete. --bonadea contributions talk 10:21, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bonadea  S ven M anguard   Wha?  15:41, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. This is a clearly non-notable BLP fake article. It should not escape deletion just because it is hiding out in user space. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 11:13, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.