Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Life in General/Userboxes/Clerical Fascism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. Consensus is to keep with the changes proposed by. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:07, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Life in General/Userboxes/Clerical Fascism

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Note that the userbox wikilinks "Christofascism" and "Islamofascism" to their respective ideologies but then wikilinks "Ziofascism" to Zionism, in essence stating that Zionism is inherently a fascist ideology. This is highly inflammatory, to say the least. This should be deleted per WP:UBCR banning substantially divisive userboxes. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 23:51, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Speaking as a progressive Zionist, why not just change the link to Neo-Zionism instead? Cullen328  Let's discuss it  01:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Either way it's still stating that a form of Zionism is equivalent to fascism (very inflammatory) and applying a double standard for Jews that isn't applied to Christians or Muslims. The userbox should link to Judaeofascism, some variation on Jewish fascism, or nothing at all. Otherwise it's pretty clear that the message of the userbox is that there's a double standard being applied to Jewish ideologies that isn't being applied to other ideologies. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 02:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Now that I think about it, the userbox does single out the Abrahamic religions of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism as possibly being fascist "fascist". While I'm sure that wasn't the original intention of the userbox it would probably be preferable if the userbox was changed to not single out any particular religion and replace the image with something more inclusive. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 02:26, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you do not realize that far right variants of Zionism are indistinguishable from fascism, then I suggest that you need to do more studying of the rich history of the topic. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  02:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * That's a hot take that's very inflammatory if I've ever seen one and still doesn't address the double standard in the userbox. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 03:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually, it is rigorously factual. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * No it's not and assuming that it is it still wouldn't be an appropriate replacement; as no other group of people linked in the userbox faces that standard. I fail to see why "Islamofascism" and "Christofascism" get linked to their respective articles while "Ziofascism" gets wikilinked to Zionism or Neo-Zionism. It's a very clear double standard. Might as well just triple bracket (((Ziofascism))) so everyone can get the point of the userbox. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 05:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I suggest that you read Kahanism and Revisionist Maximalism. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  20:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I do not support deleting these sorts of political userboxes. Zoozaz1 talk</b>  23:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep, with the caveat that Cullen's proposed changes are implemented. Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:35, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep and implement Cullen's proposed change, as anti-fascism (and more broadly, anti-authoritarianism) is acceptable. —  csc -1 01:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.