Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lightbreather/sandbox/Vigilantism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  withdrawn (non-admin closure). Kharkiv07 ( T ) 16:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

User:Lightbreather/sandbox/Vigilantism


Per WP:POLEMIC: this article has been created as a response to the user's grudges (see Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Evidence.) The content of this page is grossly offensive. Esquivalience t 02:12, 24 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's an essay in user-space created and last edited almost a year ago.  It's not at all offensive, IMO, for any general reader.  If one reader finds it offensive in conjunction with their past history and any new comments in the ongoing arbcom, the arbcom forum is open and more appropriate.  The creator is under Arbcom review and should not be expected to take on a new imposition that this MFD opens up.  As of a day ago, the creator was still beset by off-wiki sexual harassment, that the Arbcom had not responded to, from what appears to be a disgruntled editor attacking her.  Opening a new MFD seems unnecessary and inflammatory and piling on.  I think it would be better to avoid the appearance of the MFD serving to canvass for more attention to the arbitration, too. , would you please just withdraw this?  -- do  ncr  am  02:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Withdraw: Let ArbCom handle this. Esquivalience t 03:40, 24 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Sufficiently de-identified.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Ignore This essay is clearly a thinly veiled attempt to make a point, I suggest we respond to it as we would any other trolling. We can ignore this and allow the arbcom case to handle the issues related to the author. Chillum 13:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Ignore. Per Chillum. No need to feed the endless succession of drama-prone antics. Especially, this close to an arbcom solution. DeCausa (talk) 17:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Essay was created and only edited on 23 July 2014‎. It mentions and links to 0 users.  Furthermore, the only places the article is being linked to are related to this MFD and otherwise linked to by Gaijin42. I'm not sure if WP:POLEMIC applies when the page or text makes no mention of specific editors, and I can't find any identifiable information for any editor or groups of editors.  WP:UPYES does explicitly allow for user essays on wikipedia policy. Disclaimer: I haven't looked through each individual change of the page, only the mfd and the one before it (which was a year ago). I haven't paid attention to the arbcom case beyond the section linked above. &#8213;  Padenton &#124;&#9993;  20:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.