Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lilduff90/NanoWars

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep and tag. --BDD (talk) 15:22, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Lilduff90/NanoWars

 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 03:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 03:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 03:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 03:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Userspace draft for a video game "tentatively" set to be released in 2009 (which may or may not have happened, the name is somewhat commons) with no evidence of any potential for being useful. Also including two other pages for fictional characters in the same game. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * DeleteKeep Abandoned userspace drafts where the topics don't meet WP:GNG and have no references. I used a few search engines and I couldn't find anything about the game besides these drafts, so it likely wasn't released. Per SmokeyJoe, I have changed my !vote to keep. The drafts are unlikely to make it to mainspace, but the RfC's consensus (and WP:STALE, which was updated to reflect the RfC) shows that drafts generally shouldn't be deleted for not meeting notability. It's also currently abandoned, but drafts don't expire. Sunmist3 (talk) 13:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * See Wikipedia_talk:Notability/Archive_58. The community was very clear that the GNG is not a test to apply to userspace drafts.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep and replace with Inactive userpage blanked. There is no advantage to deleting, and deleting is needlessly alienating to the user.  I note that the user is active, and the nominator made no attempt to discuss before nominating at MfD.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep and replace with Inactive userpage blanked per SmokeyJoe. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 09:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.