Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lilwilwilz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was delete. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 12:28, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

User:Lilwilwilz
Personal page, full of nonsense, user's only contribution other than some vandalism to Coquerel's Sifaka; user has been inactive for over two years. Violation of WP:HOAX, WP:MADEUP, WP:SOAP, WP:WEBHOST, perhaps WP:CRYSTALBALL. —Bkell (talk) 18:10, 15 May 2009 (UTC) [I]ssues with an inappropriate user page can often be resolved through discussion with the user. I recommend discussing the concerns with Lilwilwilz first, to see if he will remove the inappropriate content, and then deleting the page, if he refuses to change it or doesn't respond in a timely manner.--Unscented (talk) 19:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC) Delete - as was expected, the user has not responded, so it seems that the proper course of action would be to delete this highly problematic nonsense soapbox hoax (though it's impressive that Lilwilwilz managed to pack all of that into one page).--Unscented (talk) 13:06, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Temporarily neutral - according to WP:DP,
 * I have left him a note on his talk page about this discussion; he is welcome to comment here about it. However, I strongly doubt we'll get a response from him. As I noted above, this user has been inactive for over two years. —Bkell (talk) 02:35, 16 May 2009 (UTC)


 * delete as possible personal attack, asserting criminal acts.  One of the cases where deletion is the proper remedy. And attempt at communication has been made. At two years, he likely will not return. Collect (talk) 13:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * G3 vandalism. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:38, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Violates multiple policies. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 05:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.