Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lionelt/Countering liberal bias (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 12:55, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

User:Lionelt/Countering liberal bias


WP:SOAPBOX. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 10:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. I disagree with almost everything in this page, but I support the right for this to be in user space. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  11:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The contents haven't changed at all since the pretty snowy MfD last year. I'd suggest you'd have more luck simply making those few corrections necessary to it to remove the problem (as detailed in the previous discussion). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:45, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Same as last time.  WP:SOAPBOX doesn't apply to views relating to Wikipedia.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:01, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - Per my logic from last time.  Toa   Nidhiki05  14:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep editors are allowed to express opinions on the subject of Wikipedia and related projects in their user space. SOAPBOX reflects this. Hut 8.5 16:49, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - if he really believes this nonsense, and wants to put it into a formal essay, it seems "pointy" to argue for its deletion, even if it treats Conservapedia as anything other than a pathetic laughingstock. Delection would be discourteous, and would indeed confirm his belief system. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  18:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment isn't this already dealt with through Systemic bias ? -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 05:01, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * It is already linked. An individual user may certainly write their own version of a project space essay. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:44, 24 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - not an abuse of userspace, not doing any harm. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:45, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - we've been fairly lenient with users including general political commentary on their own user pages (despite WP:SOAPBOX), even more so when that political commentary relates to WP itself. That leniency is likely to be extended even further when the political commentary about WP is in the form of a properly tagged user essay. Stalwart 111  06:53, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - whether we like it or not. There are plenty of Wiki-critical  essays. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep – Sir Lionel, EG(talk) 21:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.