Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lisked/sandbox/Lisk

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:51, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

User:Lisked/sandbox/Lisk


Abandoned draft created by now-indeffed user. Notability is unlikely. 10Eleventeen 19:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - GNG does not apply to userspace. Age/quality of a draft isn't reason to delete. However, there's a WP:NOT issue in retaining a draft of an article the user was indeffed for promoting. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 20:44, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep . Acceptable in userspace, a plausibly notable topic and even more so is merge-able.  Articles for deletion/Lisk is way to weak to warrent userspace deletion.  The user is blocked for spamming, but that is not quite good enough a justification to delete, this page is not spam.  Better covered at https://en.m.bitcoinwiki.org/wiki/Lisk
 * Delete per Articles for deletion/Lisk (2nd nomination). --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:56, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete the page has been decided already at AfD Legacypac (talk) 10:34, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as already deleted, in spite of creative arguments being offered evidently on the principle that creative arguments against MFD are good. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:53, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - topic does not meet inclusion criteria, as already tested at Articles for deletion/Lisk (2nd nomination). Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:30, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.