Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lizzieandpaulv2

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

User:Lizzieandpaulv2

 * (The following was added by Uzma Gamal (talk) 05:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC))
 * (The following was added by Uzma Gamal (talk) 05:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC))

WP:FORUM The content on this page is either Patent Nonsense or is being used as a forum type area. If the user doesn't re-evaluate their pages then I believe they should be cleared. Danielj2705 (talk) 19:41, 19 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment This was started by a new user today. Maybe we should give him/her/them a chance to explain? -- Klein zach  14:22, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep And you wonder why Wikipedia has problems with ER. Legoktm (talk) 00:58, 23 October 2012 (UTC) Wasn't aware of the previous user pages. Delete. Legoktm (talk) 17:03, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete all - The User:Lizzieandpaul page was started 19 September 2012‎. User:Lizzieandpaul is blocked. Delete per WP:UP. Also see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lizzie and Paul's Big Weekender. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 05:57, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:UP. I've speedied 3 out of 4 per WP:CSD, but left the first instance as the speedy criteria doesn't apply.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:50, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - as excessive writings unrelated to the project. Achowat (talk) 15:40, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.