Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Logger9

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  withdrawn, it seems barnstars earned for content which has now been found to be plagiarized can still be displayed if the user isn't indefinitely blocked. But since he is, the userpage can be blanked and replaced with. Chester Markel (talk) 16:24, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Logger9
The user misleadingly displays a barnstar awarded for content creation before he was found to be plagiarising and creating copyright violations, as noted at Contributor copyright investigations/Logger9 and an AN/I discussion. The remainder of the userpage is devoted to taking credit for contributions to specific articles, without any indication of the copyright problem. Users should not display accolades given to them under false pretences, or treat as contributions edits which are, or are currently under investigation for, copyright violations. Chester Markel (talk) 07:16, 23 December 2010 (UTC)


 * There is another problem with that user page: a massive ownership issue with the articles he made "significant" contributions to. Some of these pages, like physics of glass, were factually ceded to him by the community as his private playground to prevent him from messing up more important articles like glass. In the end, litte will remain of these "contributions". -- Marie Poise (talk) 08:12, 23 December 2010 (UTC)


 * This is ridiculous! If a User offends repeatedly we block that User indefinitely - we don't simply delete the User page.  If Logger9 has offended repeatedly then take the appropriate action to try to have him blocked.  The deletion process is only applicable to articles in articlespace and some project pages; it is not applicable to User pages.  Dolphin  ( t ) 11:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. To me it seems that no policy-based arguments have been put forward to justify the deletion of this userpage, which, in my opinion, is perfectly kosher. This user displays a barnstar and talks about himself and what he has done on Wikipedia, which is allowed under WP:UPYES. If this user has actually been plagiarising, he can be blocked and a notice placed on his userpage, but there's no point in deleting it... Salvio  Let's talk about it! 15:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.