Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Logical Premise/editorluv


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was G10 by Roger Davies, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:39, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Logical Premise/editorluv
A rather unpleasant page, which names specific editors as "clueless". I don't see what possible benefit this page has. If someone has a problem with an editor, they should either talk to the editor in person, or keep it to themselves. A subpage explaining how the user enjoys watching these editors because they're "hilarious" really makes me question the motive of why this page was made. It needs to go. -- -- how do you turn this on  21:20, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This can be speedied as an attack page. Erik the Red  2    21:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per Erik the Red. This is junk. JuJube (talk) 21:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.