Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lopac1029/Krondor Krew

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Withdrawn - and someone please let me know where the time guidelines are for spam user pages. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 11:30, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

User:Lopac1029/Krondor Krew


WP:STALEDRAFT, in the works for over 2 1/2 years, last consistent editing almost a year ago. Wknight94 talk 00:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Keep - Staledraft is not authority for deletion and says nothing about deleting drafts. These time periods are getting shorter and shorter with each nom, "almost a year"!  Comparing this to the deleted mainspace article that it was userfied from, it appears to be a significant improvement, some of the references are actually possibly no-trivial (e.g. Wired), these references weren't in the earlier version (and there is no requirement for a draft to meet WP:N, that's why it's a draft).  This draft is harmless.  Leave it, tag it with userspace draft, or blank it - though in this case I'm rather opposed to blanking as well.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 21:43, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - The fact that it was last edited in MARCH makes me think that this discussion is rather idiotic.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 22:17, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Good point! I didn't catch that.  Changing my !vote to "Speedy Keep" and strongly suggest that User:Wknight94 withdraw the nom.  This is a waste of our time.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 22:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I guess I'm not real familiar with the latest trends regarding user space. We now let people keep band articles in user space for years?  If that's the case, feel free to speedy close.  (And obviously there are some time guidelines I missed for spammy-looking pages like this.  Could someone please let me know where those are for future reference?  Thank you.)  Wknight94 talk 00:18, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep-Per Hi878. Three months? Really? Getting a little bit overzealous, don't you think?--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 22:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep or move to mainspace. Some of the references appearto demonstrate notability.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:12, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * concur.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 08:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * I think the material is improved since Articles for deletion/Krondor Krew in September 2009. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:29, 8 July 2011 (UTC)