Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:LucGospel




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete all. JohnCD (talk) 14:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

User:LucGospel
There are three almost identical pages in this nomination: It appears that this user's only activity was to post multiple copies of this long essay on religion, then disappear. I admit that I treated these pages as WP:TLDR, but from what I did read I saw no indication that this material has any valid use on Wikipedia, whether as an article, an essay, or anything else. RL0919 (talk) 00:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * User:LucGospel
 * User talk:LucGospel
 * User:LucGospel/Think,think_and_think_again.Criticism_of_the_existence_of_god.
 * Delete in favour of Gospel of Luke. Soapboxing POV-fork in userspace....  Such pages can be blanked on sight, such users, like this one, often only visit us for a few days.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all I agree with the tl;dr. Blatant soapbox-y rambling, speedy per WP:IAR if possible. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 16:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all per WP:NOTSOAPBOX and WP:NOTWEBHOST. These pages do not contribute to building the encyclopedia. Cunard (talk) 09:03, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.