Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lwsellersjr/Lewis

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. — ξ xplicit  00:38, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Lwsellersjr/Lewis


Stale draft; overly (self-)promotional. Psychonaut (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Userspace draft with some references to indicate notability. Not that different in structure and better referenced than say Leo_Burnett_Worldwide. --Surturz (talk) 04:06, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Try reading WP:OTHERSTUFF to see why that is not a reason for keeping, quite apart from the fact that one is an article and the other a stale draft. 79.123.76.131 (talk) 09:20, 6 June 2012 (UTC) — 79.123.76.131 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete Userspace draft of a user who has not edited since October 2010, and promotional: either of those would be good enough reasons to delete. (Over 90% of recent edits from Surturz, excluding edits to his/her user talk page, have been to say "keep" in MfD discussions, often with no reason given, at other times with totally inadequate reasons. Sometimes the only "reason" given has been attacks on the editor nominating the page for deletion.) 79.123.76.131 (talk) 09:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC) — 79.123.76.131 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * That is simply wrong. I am a long time editor with a clean block log and have edited countless articles over the years. MfD just has my attention at the moment. -I have not made any specific allegations against anyone at MfD in the last week. Sadly the converse is not true. I think editors should be allowed to record dissenting votes without suffering ad hominem attacks in response. If you disagree then state your counter arguments. WP:SPA accusations are hardly conducive to collaboration. --Surturz (talk) 10:52, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I think you above Keep ivote is fine and a welcome view to the discussion. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - per WP:STALEDRAFT. The last edits to the draft were 1 October 2010‎. The page was moved from mainspace for the reasons given here. The Lewis Advertising page was WP:A7 speedy deleted. Since the draft still does not indicate why its subject why Lewis Advertising is important or significant (apparently, based on the draft, Lewis Advertising has never worked on any important or significant ad campaign that people would have heard of, which is ironic for an ad company, which may be its importance/significance), A7 has not yet been overcome and the draft cannot be moved to mainspace. Lwsellersjr if you edit the draft to overcome the A7 issue, we can move the draft to mainspace. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 11:56, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too promotional.  Best left deleted until an experienced editor wishes to work on it.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 15:07, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - no clear indication of notability nor evidence of this draft being improved. User hasn't edited in over 18 months. Achowat (talk) 16:07, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.