Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lynctekrua/afch-rewrite.js/submissions.js

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  'SNOW delete The editor who uses the pseudonym'' "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)


 * See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lynctekrua/easyblock.js. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:50, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

User:Lynctekrua/afch-rewrite.js/submissions.js


Community consensus is that users require 500 mainspace edits and registered for at  least  90 days to  use this script and to  request  authority  to  use it  by  adding  their names to  WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants. User is currently blocked but  will  still  need to  be prevented from  using  the script when the block  expires. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete The user has modified the script so that he can review unsubmitted drafts: What's more, he's already done so:  He should obviously be prevented from using AfC entirely in the future. Shii (tock) 02:47, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Shii is citing me here. I'm now less sure of what happened than when I wrote that earlier comment. Please see my PS. -- Hoary (talk) 14:27, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and consider WP:SALTing so he doesn't immediately recreate it and begin using it again. Origamiteⓣⓒ 03:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * non-speedy delete so that it could be deleted under the recreation G4 reason if that happens. If we just speedy delete, then it can be speedy recreated. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:31, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * What about speedying it, but WP:IARing so that it can be G4'ed? Origamiteⓣⓒ 08:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Obvious delete Fooling around may be fun, but it should not be welcomed. Johnuniq (talk) 08:31, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Obvious delete. Squinge (talk) 11:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. And consider also deleting User:Lynctekrua/easyblock.js, whereby the author seems to try to bring to life his fantasy of being an admin. -- Hoary (talk) 14:27, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:58, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lynctekrua/easyblock.js. -- Hoary (talk) 23:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)


 * While I never quite understood the wisdom of forcing one to join a Wikiproject to be able to review drafts in an assisted fashion (and instruction for manual review of drafts have long disappeared from the pages, as I found out myself when I attempted to review one such draft), I find the reviewing of unsubmitted drafts to be inappropriate, and the script should be deleted as it also enables other to do so. I also note that it seems from a quick review that the script page was created in response to Kudpung's removal of the user from the list of users authorized to use the main script, and this is clearly unacceptable, and the script should be deleted henceforth. I would also recommend that User:Lynctekrua/afch-rewrite.js and User:Lynctekrua/afch-rewrite.js/tpl-submissions.js be deleted as well, or any other pages and copies of the AfC script in Lynctekrua's userspace.  Snowolf How can I help? 06:22, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.