Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MONGO/Ban evasion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy keep. The page needs to remain visible because it is, to a large extent, the cornerstone of an arbitration request. That non-admins should, therefore, be allowed to read its contents, is a given. El_C 05:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

User:MONGO/Ban evasion
This is a pure attack page on an editor who as cleared of ALL sockpuppetry by SIX previous RFCUs. The user has simply succesfully challenged a known cabal of users, spearheaded by MONGO. The group aggressivly POV pushes a pro-Conservative American agenda. This user, after simple disagreements, drew their ire. Since he didn't back off, they have tried to tie him to banned user after banned user because they cannot 'defeat' him on content or policy grounds, and since he apparently won't be intimidated. They are also actively trying to 'out' this user in violation of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policies. Review of all the evidence here is 100% circumstantia. A good summary of the bogus attack nature can be seen here. Summary of all of MONGO's "evidence":


 * "He's 1) human, 2) breathing, 3) lives in a structure, 4) clearly has Internet access, and 5) just edited an article that MONGO has edited in a way that is contrary to MONGO's views. Must be a sockpuppet. Which? Let's try them all based on those five key, unique data points that were not arbitrarily chosen." 70.112.20.214 21:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete immediately as an attack page. AnonnyFell 05:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong keep Page is the central evidence for a case currently at WP:RFAR, with arbitrator vote presently at 2/0/0/0 in favor of consideration. It must therefore remain at least until the WP:RFAR process has been concluded. Raymond Arritt 05:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Can't first demand evidence, then try to delete it, can we?Proabivouac 05:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Mongo's page. Delete this trolling mfd. --Tbeatty 05:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.