Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Madonna of Laroque

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep.  bibliomaniac 1  5  02:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

User:Madonna of Laroque
WP:FAKEARTICLE Weaponbb7 (talk) 05:08, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Agreed, although this could just be a description of the user name...  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 05:29, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - probably not, because the user has no other edits.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 07:48, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Links to an article that itself is in AfD. - LuckyLouie (talk) 22:07, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The AFD ended in keep. The contents of the page do not mislead the reader in any way: "might be a painting" is just that, might be or not. That a user has an interest in a narrow topic (even if it's a SPA run by someone else) is not a crime in itself. P.S. I removed the category, which was only appropriate for articles. . East of Borschov 07:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - the article has been kept at AfD, the username is acceptable, I might encourage the user to make it look less like an article, but I see no reason for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 19:33, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Creating their user page was this user's sole edit 10 months ago, and they show no sign of returning. - LuckyLouie (talk) 02:33, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak delete If the material is in project it has no purpose on userpage. Blank is fine too. Note: I add 'userpage' template. Miami33139 (talk) 02:26, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.