Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Magatism/AntiWhiteBiasSyndrome

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:53, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

User:Magatism/AntiWhiteBiasSyndrome

 * – (View MfD)

I can't see this ever becoming an article as I can't find reliable sources saying that there is such a thing. Better to clarify this now then let a new editor waste their time. Doug Weller talk 14:31, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's a draft. I know that there is such a bias, and so it could be considered a syndrome by fringe scholars.  Might be able to be reviewed with expansion.  It's a draft.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; this is just another conspiracy theory which is not notable enough for a standalone article, and I agree about the importance of not wasting editor or AfC reviewer time. --bonadea contributions talk 17:47, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete In the absence of any sources, WP:NOR, WP:RGW, WP:SOAPBOX. —[ Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 18:21, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Unworthy of MfD. The point of draftspace is drafting. Much of draftspace is hopeless and it is highly counter productive to bring everything hopeless to MfD. “ clarify this now then let a new editor waste their time” is something to do by posting on the new user’s talk page. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:05, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I've done this now, pointing that contra Robert McClenon  there's no suggestion anywhere of such a syndrome.. I wouldn't dream of suggesting that everything hopeless be brought here. But I do feel a little bit guilty now after looking at the other edits by this editor. I don't think they'll be here long.  Doug Weller  talk 06:42, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Can it be CSD-G5 deleted now? —[ Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 10:03, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as crud by indeffed editor. Not a G5, so we have to do this MFD.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as (apparently) an outline for original research on a made-up topic by a user now indeffed for trying to be a "truth fighter". As an aside, the "Maga" in "Magatism" probably comes from Trump's slogan. -Crossroads- (talk) 04:12, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.