Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mairinm/new article name here

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

User:Mairinm/new article name here


Stale userspace draft Ricky81682 (talk) 22:02, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Just Blank, replacing with Inactive userpage blanked. An intended contribution that could be worthy.  "Daily Strife", RTE’s Storyland 2 web competition.  Possibly notable, possibly could be covered at RTÉ Television.  Although the single-edit account has been gone for more than five years, there is no cost in keeping this blanked for the remote chance that she returns and looks for her old work.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:12, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * replace with a empty template? It'S a red link. 333-blue 00:30, 26 September 2015 (UTC). Fixed. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:57, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable subject that will never be a feasible article. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per CSD G13; may not be eligible for it but still unlikely to be a full-fledged article nonetheless. --189.106.237.219 (talk) 18:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Move/Delete: to Daily Strife, but kind of advertise.333-blue 00:33, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - The user made one edit five years ago. It's a stale draft and a fake article.  The topic is an online video series, but there are very few hits and no reviews online for this topic after five years, so it's unlikely to become notable any time soon.  Can't redirect to the video game it's based on because that doesn't have an article either.  Can't use db-g13, though; that's only for drafts that have been submitted for review. SmokeyJoe's suggestion of blanking it would also be acceptable. Anne Delong (talk) 05:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.