Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Malcolm/Userboxes/Butt

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep. JohnCD (talk) 18:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Malcolm/Userboxes/Butt
Yeah ... no. Absolutely useless and offensive template ... and it actually links to buttocks instead of some funny meme. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  17:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I see you did not notify the !owner of the userbox (and the encompassing userspace) that you nominated it for deletion. Also, the userbox was userfied per a previous TfD Charon X /talk 23:14, 23 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nominator... why would someone create this? → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 22:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Why would someone want to have pictures of trains on his userpage (no offense meant)? Userspace is the place to be a bit more casual, whether that means to make some weird userbox or to put up some images of trains. Live and let live, there's enough drama to go round as is. Charon X /talk 23:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Useless? Probably. Offensive? I kinda fail to see why. Would you have preferred if it linked to some kind of funny meme? Bottom-line, it is in userspace, and I fail to see a point to cause drama by deleting an user's userbox. Charon X /talk 23:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep-- I see no reason to reopen this when it has already been closed at Tfd. Also, I don't think this counts as "useless", when two users (counting the creator) have it on their userpages.  While thats a small number, it's probably more than a lot of other userboxes. --E♴ (talk) 05:18, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep what is and is not offensive can be so subjective. I cannot see how this can be construed as offensive, there is no profanity nor objectionable imagery. It does not seek to belittle, demean or disparage people or particular groups of people. Useless? Perhaps, but that doesn't mean it's detrimental to this project. Lovetinkle (talk) 00:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep "Useless" is true of 98% of all userspace - especially userboxes. But it is not a reason for deletion. Collect (talk) 18:39, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's humorous. I don't find it offensive at all. There's many humorous userboxes of this type. -- &oelig; &trade; 19:15, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.