Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Malekhalayla

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. — xaosflux  Talk 04:05, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Malekhalayla


WP:NOTWEBHOST, account created Jan 2013, only 3 edits are to user page. NE Ent 10:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Using userboxes to show your language skills is directly related to this project. There is nothing at all wrong with this page. This MfD is a bit bitey to the new user. Chillum 13:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I stumbled across this page looking for an active Dutch speaker following the category Category:User nl. I don't consider an individual who creates a page and then makes no edits for 610 days a "newbie." "User pages are for communication and collaboration."  You can't collaborate with someone who isn't there. While it's generally understood that, as a courtesy, we let userpages of former editors remain, this individual never contributed to the project and therefore it is not discourteous to remove the page. NE Ent 14:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * A certain edit rate is not required here. If the person decides to only edit once every 2 years that is fine. I assume they will contribute later. The language categories are full of less than active editors, the lack of prior contributions does not make it worse. By "new" I meant inexperienced, if the guy comes back after a year to find his page deleted that may be discouraging. Chillum 14:20, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Perhaps this could be withdrawn? Chillum 20:24, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: While Wikipedia is not a webhost, this is pretty standard content for a userpage. While I agree this person probably created the userpage and abandoned the account, and therefore there's no point in having it around... we don't require levels of activity to maintain membership. As a comparison, consider the abandonment of placing indeffed user talk pages in CAT:TEMP. I would be interested in joining a policy discussion about potentially deleting "abandoned userpages" under situations similar to those required for WP:USURP (e.g., no edits outside of userspace, inactive for a long time). —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 14:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep as relevant to the 'pedia and isn't different from any other userpage here, I kindly suggest the nominator re-reads Don't bite the newbies, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  20:57, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.