Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Maleliberation/images

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. BencherliteTalk 12:58, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

User:Maleliberation/images


User pages are not intended for large numbers of polemical statements unrelated to Wikipedia editing, or excessive promotion of any kind. Wikipedia, as a whole, is not a soapbox or a webhost. This is an illustrated opinion piece, arguably polemical and certainly promotional, created by a user blocked, in part, on account of clear username concerns.  Super Mario  Man  01:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Unsure. Definitely problems.  Currently an SPA advocacy account, but I see enough contribution that is project-related to hesitate in agreeing to delete, largely because deletion can look like censorship, and the appearance of censorship can be worse than the problematic material, and partly because there may have been some valid points made that need further consideration.  Is there anti-male bias in some mainspace articles?  Always possible I guess.  If there is, is clumsy combative to be tolerated?  No, and so the block is probably appropriate, but do we need to delete the user's userspace material?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:43, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotional soapbox of user indefinitely blocked for the same. --BDD (talk) 19:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.