Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mama Dear Kids

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 05:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

User:Mama Dear Kids


Inappropriate use of userspace as per WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Username suggests WP:COI with the subject of the writings. Drm310 (talk) 06:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

This page is an informative page about the life of Jessie Lee Jarrett. This page is helpful to a broad audience seeking true stories about Black History not written in common textbooks. This is an individual who received a Congressional Proclamation and was a pillar of the community. All of the pictures are owned by me and none of the images are in violation of any copyright laws. I am open to revising some of the content narrative, but am diametrically opposed to the information being deleted.

Rhonda Bell Mama Dear Kids (talk) 15:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


 * This does not negate the fact that this is a Wikipedia userpage, which are not encyclopedia articles. The purpose of a userpage is to introduce yourself to the Wikipedia community and provide basic biographical info about yourself and your Wikimedia-related activities.
 * If your intention was to make this a draft article for future publication, I would support a move of the content into your user sandbox, located at User:Mama Dear Kids/sandbox. This is a type of user subpage where you can work on a draft, outside of the main user and article space.
 * Please note that all Wikipedia subjects must be supported by citations from reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Any unpublished correspondence or personal knowledge is considered original research and cannot be included.
 * Also, articles must be written from a purely dispassionate, neutral point of view. Subjective wording that heaps praise upon a subject will not be accepted.
 * Since you have identified yourself as a relative, you have a clear conflict of interest in this matter. Persons who are close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, and find it difficult to write in an objective manner. Please consult Wikipedia's plain and simple conflict of interest guide on how to proceed in this situation.
 * Finally, your username is a problem. Wikipedia has a username policy which disallows usernames that represent a group of people, or imply that the account is shared by more than one person. Wikipedia accounts can only represent a single individual and cannot be shared. Please request a change of username as soon as possible. --Drm310 (talk) 16:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Begin section copied from the AFD's talk page
 * Delete - Wikipedia user pages are not for web hosting. If this is meant for article space, I can (weakly) support putting this through Article for Creation as a draft but quite frankyl, I don't really hold out much hope that our policy on neutral point of view would be satisfied, nor would our inclusion criteria based on the material that is on the user page. -- Whpq (talk) 03:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. The page does not appear to be intended as a encyclopedic biography - it is essentially a personal website.  In agreement with Whpq, I don't think the subject meets our inclusion criteria.  If the final decision is to keep the text, however, I strongly encourage moving it to draft article space without leaving a redirect because it is not suitable userpage content (it is not about the user).  Deli nk (talk) 13:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

The article for Jessie Lee Jarrett is meant to serve as an informative page about the life of Jessie Lee Jarrett. This page is helpful to a broad audience seeking true stories about Black History not written in common textbooks. Jarrett received a Congressional Proclamation and was a pillar of the community. All of the pictures are owned by me (Rhonda Bell) and none of the images are in violation of any copyright laws. I have revised the narrative and removed specific content, but am diametrically opposed to the entire article and valuable information being deleted from future generations.

Rhonda Bell(Mama Dear Kids (talk) 16:30, 28 January 2015 (UTC))

End section copied from the AFD's talk page
 * I believe the above is from the MFD talk page -- Whpq (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Oops, you're right; sorry. Nyttend (talk) 04:49, 30 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment - The original user has now blanked the page. --Drm310 (talk) 17:25, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete As previous editors have argued. Furthermore, now that it has been blanked by the author it qualifies for a speedy G7 (assuming the SPA IP is also the author, which seems very likely as the IP has only mad eedits to this article). Meters (talk) 19:53, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.