Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mandakinibansal99/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. MER-C 04:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

User:Mandakinibansal99/sandbox


This doesn't appear to be a real effort at developing an encyclopedic draft. It appears to be purely a reflection or promotion, and is being tendentiously resubmitted, wasting the time of the reviewers. Is some experienced editor willing to work this into a real article? If not, we should delete it rather than wasting the time of the reviewers. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:54, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Legacypac (talk) 18:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as an article that will never pass WP:GNG, and is therefore wasting time by being kept. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:05, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Clearly unacceptable at this time. SwisterTwister   talk  21:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.