Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mariah Craighead/Jacob Latimore

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Mariah Craighead/Jacob Latimore
Relisted. Salvio Let's talk about it! 00:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)



Stale userspace draft that has a bit of a promotional tone. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 05:33, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment user has written Jacob Latimore which looks like a candidate for Afd. Maybe it would have been better to do the Afd before the Mfd? -- Klein zach  23:45, 28 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio  Let's talk about it! 00:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:UP states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion.. Because this page violates WP:UP and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 07:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * This page lacks inline citations and contains only unreliable or primary sources (http://radio.disney.go.com/artists/incubator/jacob_latimore/bio.html, http://www.welovejacob.com/, http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3632976/?quicklinks_select=/name/nm3632976/filmoyear, http://www.facebook.com/jacoblatimore?sk=info, http://www.kidzworld.com/article/24822-jacob-latimore-bio, and http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3632976/filmotype). A poorly sourced BLP of a minor should not be retained in userspace. The corresponding mainspace article also lacks reliable sources. However, I do not believe it should be nominated for deletion. The subject passes Notability per this Google News Archive search. See this articleWebCite from the St. Louis American and this articleWebCite from evous.fr. Cunard (talk) 07:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I have added the St. Louis American to the article. Cunard (talk) 08:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.