Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mark wright/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

User:Mark wright/sandbox


See Articles for deletion/Ajithkumar Nair and Sockpuppet investigations/Ajithmattam/Archive. Declined G5 as it wasn't technically created in violation of a block or ban. Pinging and  as they were involved with the cleanup here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete As promotional material/auto bio. I didn't participate in the the AfD, but i get the feeling that the material in the sandbox is probably pretty close to whatever the contents of Ajithkumar Nair were, perhaps essentially a G4 or a G6. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  21:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete this is process for process sake. No one is going to work on this. Legacypac (talk) 21:16, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete it was just preparation for reinstating a bio about a non-notable civil servant/diplomat. Ajithmattam always claimed that they were not socking and they were not the article subject but, regardless, there is no way the subject has a claim to notability etc and I see no need to let this languish as temptation for another attempt at recreation. - Sitush (talk) 21:35, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. CSD#U5 would appear to apply.  I guess there are a lot of associated deleted contributions?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:12, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.