Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Masky/Templates/Template/Short


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete all as needless and inferior duplications of existing templates. —Doug Bell talk 20:02, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

User:Masky/Templates/Template/Short
This template should either be deleted or redirected to expand. Furthermore, this template places an article in Category:Short Articles, which should be deleted per CSD C3 when this is complete. --After Midnight 0001 19:20, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Similarly User:Masky/Templates/Template/Construction for Underconstruction and User:Masky/Templates/Template/Unsourced for Unsourced --After Midnight 0001 19:24, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. It took the stub-sorting project many many months to subsume the old substub template into the main body of stubs, since really general article length only needs to be split into stub, to expand, and good. This simply opens up another subdivision. Also, with the rating system now employed by the WP quality project, this is unnecessary. As you say, one it goes the category can go too. Grutness...wha?  23:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for redundancy. Wooyi 02:16, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all as excessively threatening. The other two are okay, but unneeded. Koweja 02:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - Do not transclude userspace pages into articles. &mdash;dgies tc 02:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.