Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:May2008

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

User:May2008

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

The only creation of a non-contributor, this is a complete misuse of Stonewall Jackson's article, masked as a user page. Sundostund (talk) 03:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Pointless 14-year-old fork, now far out of date from improvements to the actual article anyway. BD2412  T 04:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as a bad joke by a user who came, left this coprolite, and departed. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:45, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Blank with Userpage blanked. Do not delete. I'm sympathetic to the issues raised above, but I believe transparency is better in these sorts of cases than sweeping such mischief under an opaque rug. BusterD (talk) 16:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:UPCOPIES 192.76.8.81 (talk) 10:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:UPCOPIES. SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:14, 11 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete obvious illegal article copy. Dronebogus (talk) 04:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:UPCOPIES. I see no evidence that this copy was ever even worked on for improvement. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.