Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mbz1/collection




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  blank as a compromise. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 13:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

User:Mbz1/collection
Another attack page, this time collecting a list diffs by others, and per the attacks in the edit summaries and diffs therin, it is obviously a list of perceived flaws. Something that isn't allowed at wikipedia. —  Dæ dαlus Contribs 08:16, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * comment you have a COI here Daedalus969, as one of your edits are listed. This list is so tame it is not yet clear what it is for.  If an RFC case is being constructed then the guideline suggests a week lifetime only. However this does not seem to be heading this way. So I cannot see any reason to delete at this point. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep As an "attack page" it seems as mild as any possible. As for a "list of perceived flaws", some folks have lists of dozens of mine .  Collect (talk) 13:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid keep reason. The user is keeping personal attacks in her userspace, personal attacks they have given, and there is no good reason for that.—  Dæ  dαlus Contribs 18:56, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete and ask Mbz1 to stop playing games that taunt others. Ask others to stop reading MBz1's userpages.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:11, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Calling this an attack page is a stretch. SPhilbrick  T  14:03, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep
 * When I am using clever quote
 * That smarter one than me once wrote,
 * And blamed for personal attack
 * I have strong urge to fire back:
 * "I never sought to take the credit;
 * So, please assume that Oscar said it." :)--Mbz1 (talk) 02:32, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as a page that belittles comments made by other users. The only purpose of this page is to discredit those with an opposing viewpoint. There is no reason to permit this to remain in userspace. Cunard (talk) 03:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep It's harmless. As an "attack", it is an extremely mild one. I think with things like this, it is better just to ignore them to make a big deal out of them, such as by nominating them here. --SJK (talk) 09:24, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.