Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Meeples10/School1st

User:Meeples10/School1st
 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy Keep. Nomination reason, once explained, ended up being a misunderstanding by a newbie who's since spiraled out of control into blocky blocky land anyway, so I'm withdrawing it. --erachima talk 09:09, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

WP:NOTBLOG

On behalf of --erachima talk 02:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


 * As for my own opinion, I'm going with Keep. This appears to be a sandbox page for testing various code uses, not a blog, and the user's edits outside of their userspace, while very minimal, do not appear to be destructive. This is at the very least a premature nomination, seeing as the account in question is under a week old. --erachima talk 02:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Do you have any policy-based reasons for that !vote? It seems to be very clearly the use of wikipedia for the purposes of some 'test', clearly outside of the mission of this project - can you explain why it is not?


 * Keep - come back in a year if the page still seems to threaten the order of the world. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Got any policy to support that, demi, or just spouting unsupported opinion? 88.104.27.75 (talk) 03:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * USER, subheading "Experimentation (usually on subpages)", which includes "Trial pages for templates, unfamiliar or specialist markup (including LaTeX), etc., as a kind of personal sandbox.", which is to say, the precise content of the page under discussion. Now stop acting belligerent because people disagree with you. --erachima talk 03:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Snow Keep Doesn't look all that different from my own sandbox. This is exactly what sandboxes are for. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:02, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment &mdash; 88.104.27.75 is currently engaged in edit warring, editing to make a point, and pretending not to hear advice of other editors. Request for deletion should be taken less than seriously.     DK   qwerty     07:37, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.