Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mender/Comprised Of

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus. No consensus to delete. Blanking is available. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

User:Mender/Comprised Of

 * – (View MfD)

This linked from a project page as a counterargument to GD's essay. Given that it makes no actual argument and the inflammatory edit summary at creation, I think this is safe to kill at this point. I realize user space has quite a bit of leeway, but come on. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 15:27, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete as useless work of user who hasn't edited in five years. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:46, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep but Blank. A petty protest about Comprised of and User:Giraffedata/comprised of, which has upset a number of people, despite being right.  The page is a Wikipedian's expression in userspace, and is well covered by reasonable leeway, and deleting would amount to censorship of project-related opinion.  Given that the user is five years inactive, blank, but allow them to unblank on their return, if they have not changed their mind about the essay and related improvements to English expression in mainspace.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep and blank with inactive userpage blanked per SmokeyJoe. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 02:31, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.