Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mender/Comprised Of (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. Consensus best summed up as who gives a shit anyway. As per my previous close, blanking remains available should anyone care to expend the calories. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:04, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

User:Mender/Comprised Of

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Some incomprehensible in-joke nonsense from a long inactive user, apparently created disruptively. Dronebogus (talk) 09:28, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * It should have been blanked after the last deletion discussion. Just blank it. There is no need for this discussion. --Bduke (talk) 09:42, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Why keep around a blank, useless page? Why not just chuck it? Dronebogus (talk) 09:43, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Why delete a blank, useless page? Why not just leave it alone? — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 04:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's a waste of space & the editor who created it, seems to have been gone away, for quite some time. GoodDay (talk) 00:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * You do realize that when we delete something, we don't actually delete it, right? It's just not publicly visible. In fact, creating an MfD, and editing an MfD just takes up more space rather than less. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 12:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Readily compensable. There is a long history, including occassions of people being upset.  See Comprised of and Comprised of.  This page is clearly an attempt to disrupt a disputed practice of fixing what is regarded by some language professionals as incorrect.  Note the creation edit summary "Just to annoy the mistaken Grammar Nazi...".  I expect it does not annoy, but feel free to blank the six year old userpage.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Blank per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mender/Comprised Of. No need to discuss this here again. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 18:38, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Just blank it. Was a second MfD really necessary? Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 22:15, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Literally zero deletion rationale presented. It's a sandbox page. People do goofy things in sandboxes. There's no reason to blank it, there's no reason to delete it -- this is WP:RAGPICKING. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 12:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I mainly nominated it because it seemed to be disruptive in nature, albeit from some fossilized squabble of zero importance. Dronebogus (talk) 12:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a user page, and not just that, it's a sandbox. There's no way you can see "A is comprised of B and C" as a disruptive edit. ☢️Plutonical☢️  ᵀᵃˡᵏ ᵗᵒ ᵐᵉ  11:54, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 04:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.