Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mheronime

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. User's comments seem to be about his deleted article Advertising Science rather than about this user page. JohnCD (talk) 09:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

User:Mheronime


Advertisement for his PR services; already been warned about undisclosed paid editing Orange Mike  &#124;  Talk  14:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm not being paid to write this Wikipedia article. I have been in the advertising business for over 30 years. In that time, there has been a lot of discussion about the art and the science of advertising. I have spent part of my career as an adjunct professor at the University of North Texas' Mayborn School of Journalism teaching Principles in Advertising. I have lectured on the topic of advertising at several other universities including Oklahoma University, the University of Texas, Texas Christian University, and Southern Methodist University. I have a profound interest in the business and artistry of advertising and marketing.


 * I am now an employee of Calise Partners, an advertising agency in Dallas, Texas. You can see my LinkedIn profile here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeheronime The main reason for my recent move from Agency Entourage to Calise Partners is their interest in taking a scientific approach to advertising. This scientific approach, while not an entirely new topic, is a worthy topic for discussion in our field. There has been a fair amount of debate about what makes advertising effective. I believe it's time for people in our business to realize that what we do falls into the category of science rather than art since we have more specific desired outcomes that we want to control. Art tends to be more open ended for personal interpretation.


 * I am creating this article for Wikipedia for academic purposes. I was totally surprised to learn that there isn't already an article on this topic on Wikipedia. My intention is to invite others through LinkedIn to comment, edit and discuss this topic on Wikipedia and on LinkedIn. There is real value in helping our industry come to terms with the science of our practice. I would appreciate any help and guidance I can get from Wikipedia in having this topic added to the encyclopaedia. Thanks, Mheronime (talk) 15:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Simple case of FAKEARTICLE. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:UP. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.