Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MichaelCPrice/mega2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Despite minimal discussion, result is clear and correct. Xoloz 14:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

User:MichaelCPrice/mega2
This page is essentially a stored copy of an earlier version of the article Ebionites which contains the additions of its creator. Those additions, and that editor's conduct during the debate over the relevance and even accuracy of the additions which have been removed from the main article but are still contained here, are the main reason why the editor in question has recently lost an arbitration case as per here. Request that the page be deleted and if possible that it be prevented from being recreated later by the editor in question. John Carter 15:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Normally I tend to give a user leniency on keeping disputed article content, and this looks like he was trying to build his case, but he had his chance and lost as judgment was rendered in arbitration. The page should suffer the same fate as his defense.--12 N oo n 17:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete based on lost arbitration. Doczilla 08:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.