Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Michelangelo122/World's Oldest Living Men

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. --BDD (talk) 16:50, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

User:Michelangelo122/World's Oldest Living Men


In line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bensonfood, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:05, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails NOTWEBHOST, FAKEARTICLE, TRIVIA, OR, SYNTH etc, etc. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 23:07, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep or migrate to Wikia - unless this intends to be a future article, or it is useful for WikiProject World's Oldest People, I would suggest migrating it to Wikia. —  AMK152  (t • c) 01:10, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Why this version? Are you going to be asking for every person's single table to be moved there? Is the Wikia supposed to be a place where people can all make up various lists? I'm pretty that if it is deleted, it would be acceptable for me to send you the actual markup providing that Wikia acknowledge that the article came this Wikipedia page (I'm sure there's a template there for this licensing issue). -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:11, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Struck as unnecessarily argumentative. I believe the onus is on the person from the relevant Wikia project to ask for the content. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE. Ca2james (talk) 01:13, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Violates several policies (WP:NOTWEBHOST, etc) and possibly WP:NOTHERE. User has made little to no edits outside of other longevity userpages (all up for deletion). CommanderLinx (talk) 14:52, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I had seen this earlier and meant to nominate on more or less the same grounds as CommanderLinx. Canadian   Paul  23:54, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment If anyone else confused by the number of editors still working on this list during this discussion? A cursory glance at the prior discussions shows that this isn't likely to remain and I don't get why this list is favored over the ones at the WikiProject. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:03, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 * It seems as though the editors are treating this and other userspace pages as articles and collaborating on them. Moreover, it seems that these pages are holding spaces for information and are not draft articles. It's as though the WikiProject editors are using Wikipedia for their own purposes without taking Wikipedia guidelines and policies into account. Since several of the members of this WikiProject are also members of the GRG, it seems to me that this information should be kept by the GRG on their own servers or on a wikia pages instead of using Wikipedia as a web host. Ca2james (talk) 16:12, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I have expressed similar concerns at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Future supercentenarians (2nd nomination). DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 10:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.