Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MickeyDangerez

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. Content removed, Nominator withdraws (non-admin closure) Legacypac (talk) 02:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

User:MickeyDangerez


User continues to try to host promotional material – a copy of a page about his magazine (which is itself under deletion nomination, and which user has already claimed a conflict of interest over) – despite attempts to remove the material. So, I'm taking it to MfD instead. Deacon Vorbis (talk) 20:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * To add, the owner claims that this is a protest (over what, I'm not exactly sure, but it seems to do with perceived injustices regarding the deletion process for a couple articles that he's involved with), and has generally shown unwillingness to engage in discussion. See his talk page and these deletion discussions for more background: Articles for deletion/Daggafari and Articles for deletion/Dagga Magazine.  --Deacon Vorbis (talk) 20:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * You claim the copy of the Dagga Magazine article is promotion but you don't raise the same issue first on the current article. Also you didn't delete the Magazine section on your first delete but another section which is a copy of the Daggafari article. Therefore you claim of promotion is unfound. I am unwilling to engage in discussion because discussions are irrelevant where administrative powers and guidelines are abused to suite POV. The same user nominated the Daggafari article for deletion on the English Wikipedia. Thus I have posted the articles to my user page in protest of the dictatorship experienced and how it was handled, regarding the initial delete and redirect of Daggafari it was an abuse of power to delete and redirect the page without consulting first on the talk page. Only afterwards was a note posted to the talk page. This problem stretches cross wiki onto the Afrikaans wiki where they have even protected the page af:Dagga to keep unreferenced claims about that cannabis plant and rolled back referenced entries. Nobody can show me a clear example of what defines notability. The presence of a copy of these articles on my user page does not cause harm, nor is it disruptive and is not for promotional reasons. At this stage I really don't care what happens to my user page or any of the content I have created on Wikipedia because I cannot continue to spent my time on a platform if dictatorship trumps guidelines and notability is whinged by cherry picking snippets of guidelines instead of clearly showing examples of notability and none-notabiltiy as evidence. I was blocked on my first day on the Afrikaans Wikipedia for adding info an administrator disagreed with but no reason existed. See af:Gebruikerbespreking:MickeyDangerez. Furthermore you deleted my entry on my talk page without showing me what sections of the Wikipedia guidelines the actions go against. Instead of allowing me to continue my analysis of the delete nominations. User talk:MickeyDangerez-- Mickey  ☠  Dangerez  22:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia is a collabertive effort where we make decisions about what stays on the project through discussions like this. For notability see WP:N and WP:GNG. Thank-you for alerting En Wiki that the Afrikaans wiki users find your content and behavior problematic, as that may help sort out how to deal with both here. It is a very bad idea to write about yourself or organizations you are closely connected with. Even the best contributors find the WP:COI hard to overcome. Best to let disinterested users write about the topics you are personally connected too.Legacypac (talk) 23:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I manage my COI with pristine clarity and neutrality. The creator of Dagga Couple is closely connected to the subject but has been left unchecked. I have proven notability of my subjects. The Afrikaans Wiki doesn't find my behavior problematic. My behavior has been in good faith, even my protest on my user page is in good faith. It has already been established that COI doesn't mean you can't add neutrally to the subject. I am just exhausted by editors disregard for Wiki guidelines when performing administrative actions.-- Mickey  ☠  Dangerez  01:04, 14 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Withdrawn. The page owner removed the content I was objecting to, so it's moot now.  Request a speedy keep.  --Deacon Vorbis (talk) 01:50, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.